Masthead header

Tech Talk – Camera Sound Blimps Update

The sound blimp is the quintessential production stills photographer’s tool. It is a sound proof enclosure to make the stills camera almost entirely silent. This device means that a photographer can shoot during takes without his or her shutter sound being picked up by the sensitive microphones used by sound recordists.

Sound blimps are also often used by court photographers, classical music and wildlife photographers for when it is absolutely imperative that the slapping sound of the shutter does not disturb the proceedings. I’ve worked almost entirely without one for most of my career as a unit stills photographer, but it makes the job substantially more difficult than it already is. My main reticence to acquire one was the unwieldy nature of the Jacobson Blimp, which up until the last couple of years was the only option.

There has been a lot of discussion lately about whether sound blimps will soon become obsolete with advancing camera technology. To my knowledge, at this time there is no completely silent dSLR camera model and even the fabled quietness of the Leica M9 rangefinder is not sufficient to meet the requirements of most film sets. High end point and shoot cameras can often be rendered silent but in my opinion the image quality these cameras can produce is not yet sufficient to be relied on for creating publicity images on film sets. Nikon and Canon Pro series cameras now have “silent mode” which shoots without the manual shutter slap, but reports from users of these bodies consistently mention it not being an effective solution.

meet the blimps: click to enlarge

I’ve previously written a detailed round up (including links to available videos) of all the sound blimp options in TT 15 Sound Blimp Round Up (LINK). This article will serve as a simplified rendition of the information in that article. In case you’re wondering, I have no commercial relationship with any of the manufacturers, but I’ve liaised with most over the last couple of years and that information has informed this article.

The table below summarises all of the available information on each of the 5 available or soon to be available sound blimps. In the future, I’ll be looking to test all the sound blimps under the same conditions – subject to the manufacturers being prepared to supply me with test equipment – I’ve got the team on standby for just this purpose!

I’ll welcome comments and suggestions for updates to this information.

Notes
US Prices correct at March 2012 via BH Photo Video and manufacturer’s web sites.
Aquatech Blimps are now available for purchase and for hire in the UK via Fixation

Product Price
$USD
Weight Supported Cameras Accessible camera functions Availability
Jacobson Sound Blimp
website
Blimp
$1000
Lens tubes
inc B&W/ Schneider Filters
$300-$350
1.4kg /3lb Canon and Nikon All models 2 stage shutter
LCD Screen
Available
Aquatech Sound Blimp
website
Blimp
$994
Lens Tubes
inc B&W/ Schneider Filters
$375-$495
1kg /2lb
to
1.26kg/2lb, 12oz
Canon
7D
5D Mk II
1D Mk II
1D Mk III
1D Mk IV
Nikon
D700
D300/D300s
D4/D3/D3s/D3x
2 stage shutter
LCD Screen
Back Focus
Control Wheel (aperture/shutter)
Canon “Q” button
Available
Advanced Sound Blimp
website
Blimp
$774
Lens Tubes
$171-189
1.4kg /3lb Canon
5D Mk II
1Ds Mk III
and similar
Shutter (wireless),
LCD Screen
Available
Shutterbubble
website
Blimp
$950
Lens Tubes all lenses
$375
1kg /2lb Canon and Nikon all bodies with or without grip/motor drive 2 stage shutter
LCD Screen
TBA
Fatboy Sound Blimp website Blimp $675
Lens Tubes $285-$325 without filters
760g/1.68lb Canon
50D
7D
5D series
Nikon
D800, D700
D300s
D200
D7000
2 stage shutter
LCD Screen
Available

If you love it, show it!
Film publicity and marketing resources
Production Stills TECH TALK

charles crain - November 21, 2011 - 6:09 pm

thanks for the comparisons among the sound blimps on the market today. I think I will wait for the fatboy now…..

Angus - December 2, 2011 - 1:24 pm

I can see why that would be a tempting option. I’m looking at going to the Aquatech. Thanks for your feedback!

CL - February 28, 2012 - 8:28 pm

How soundproof does a blimp need to be? I am shooting stills for a production for the first time this weekend and am making my own blimp. From what i see on youtube of the fatboy and jacobson, even the professional ones are not completely soundproof. If they can be picked up on the mics of the cameras for those videos wont they be picked up on a set? Just wondering how it all works and what level of soundproofing is needed.

Angus - February 28, 2012 - 10:06 pm

Hi CL! Thanks for your question. The only definitive answer to how quiet a camera needs to be on set is “Quiet enough to satisfy the sound recordist”.

That probably doesn’t sound very helpful, but based on conversations I’ve had on set with many sound recordists they all vary. Some recordists have told me (and other photographers I’ve spoken to) that the Jacobson Blimp is not quiet enough for them and others have said that the Pelican based options will do the trick.

Your best bet is to talk to the recordist on set, and if possible test with them before shooting commences. Obviously there are a number of variables including the effectiveness of your blimp as well as your position on set in relation to the microphones as well as the types of microphones being used.

As with many of the challenges you’ll face as a stills photographer on a film set – communication with the people you work with will be the best approach.

Angus - February 28, 2012 - 10:12 pm

Oh, and I forgot to say… Congratulations on your first gig and I hope it goes great for you!

CL - March 5, 2012 - 9:57 pm

Thanks Angus, it was helpful and realistic advice! After doing the stills this weekend I did find the blimp was quite effective in some cases and less effective in others. Depended on the acoustics of the room/location too. Just needed to communicate as you said, with the recordist and camera guy to position myself in the best place, and shoot in between takes if necessary, but the blimp certainly helped. Alot of times it silenced it enough to be under the ambient noise.

Thanks again.

PSbyAY - March 12, 2012 - 9:18 pm

That’s really good feedback. Thanks for updating me!

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*

G a l l e r i e s
Q u i c k   F i n d
L i n k s